COMPARING AND CONTRASTING THE ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGIES AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF TOURISM
Keywords:
carrying capacity, methodologies, tourist, host, tourism impact, tourism planningAbstract
Tourism has impacts upon a destination country. The aim of this work is to compare and contrast the alternative methodologies available for evaluating the impact of tourism. Tourism can be one of alternatives for development of a destination and sometimes the only possibility. For that reason it is very important to compare benefit and cost that tourism brings with corresponding valyes of alternative investment. Obtained results represent a very important input for planning and also for decision making policy. Different methodologies bring different results, different techniques have their own strenghts and weaknesses. For that reason, depending on the need, it is important to combine the methodologies in order to achieve the maximal benefit and minimal costs, from economical aspect, socio-cultural and environmental development.Downloads
Published
20-12-2007
How to Cite
DJURASEVIC, S., & NEDELEA, A. (2007). COMPARING AND CONTRASTING THE ALTERNATIVE METHODOLOGIES AVAILABLE FOR EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF TOURISM. Revista De Turism - Studii și cercetări în Turism, (4), 13–18. Retrieved from https://revistadeturism.ro/index.php/rdt/article/view/2828
Issue
Section
Articles
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Silvana DJURASEVIC, Alexandru NEDELEA

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Revista de Turism: Studii si Cercetari in Turism (RDT) is an open access scholarly journal that allows free access to its content (articles, issues). RDT is available online to the readers without financial, legal, or technical barriers (no publication charges), based on the theory to keep an article's content intact. Authors can use Creative Commons licenses to specify usage rights of articles. Copyright of articles belong to authors.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0.